Alright, Brah! We’ve reached the end of this logic stream. Over the last few weeks, we’ve debugged the “Ancient OS,” analysed the “System Admin Problem,” and peeked into the “Belonging Glitch.” Today, on 24 January, 2026, it’s time for the final commit.
My “ultimate commenter” (Ananymous, I see you! XAXAXA) has been fighting hard for the “Source Code.” But as we close this series, I want to stand firm on what I see from the ground in Johor Bahru: The future of humanity doesn’t need a “middleman.”
1. Deleting the “System Admin” Layer
We’ve established that religions don’t just unite; they separate. The moment you create a “Holy Book,” you create an “Admin” who interprets it. History shows us that these admins—no matter the religion—eventually use that power for personal gain, forcefully implementing regulations that benefit their own belief and even killing to protect it.
In 2026, we are upgrading. We are deleting the “Admin” layer. We don’t need a religious scholar to tell us how to control our impulses or how to be “good.” Our brains have the hardware for empathy and cooperation pre-installed by evolution.
2. The Logic of the Present vs. The Fear of the Future
Ananymous keeps talking about the “End Game” and “Risk Management.” But living life based on the fear of a “Shutdown Protocol” is like running your laptop in Safe Mode forever because you’re afraid of a virus. You never get to see what the machine can really do!
I’m preparing for the future, yes I do! But I’m not preparing for a mythical courtroom. I’m preparing for a legacy of logic. To me, there is no room for religion in science; it only restricts innovation with ancient “No-Go Zones.” How are we really going to build a 2026 future if our hands are tied by limitations written in a desert centuries ago?
3. Belonging Without the “Tribal Password”
The “Sense of Belonging” is the most addictive bug in the human OS. We feel warm when we are with our “own.” But true freedom is being able to walk into any room, with any human, and recognize them as a peer because of shared Human DNA, not a shared Religious Identity.
I’ve been following my own thinking for all these years. I don’t pray for recovery when I’m sick; I trust the medicine because it’s peer-reviewed and proven. I don’t look for “Signs” in the clouds; I look for data in the dashboard. And honestly? I’m doing fine. XAXAXA!
4. The Final Conclusion: You Are the Source
The ultimate question remains: Who created humanity? To some, it’s a “Who.” To me, it’s a “How.” And the “How” is beautiful enough without the need for ancient stories.
Religion persecutes freedom. It tells you that you are “created weak” and need a crutch. I say: Upgrade your RAM. Realise that you are an autonomous unit capable of writing your own purpose. We should try not to abuse our power, and we can do that through transparency and collective logic, not through fear of a “Root Certificate” we can’t verify.
Final Thoughts
This series wasn’t about “rejecting” anything—it was about outgrowing it. The 2026 Mindset is about standing on your own two feet, looking at the stars, and realising you don’t need a “Scroll” to tell you they are beautiful.
To Ananymous and all the other “secret admirers” out there: I appreciate the debate. But my journey is mind-opening because there are no walls. The firewall is down. The code is open. And the future is ours to write. XAXAXA!
References
- “Religions Separate not Unite: A 2026 Perspective” – Rem.my
- “Digital Humanism: A Manifesto for a Fact-Based Future” – TU Wien
- “Don’t Let Power Corrupt You” – Harvard Business Review
- “Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment” – NYU Press
This series is officially “Closed.” Would you like me to start a new thread on “The Economics of 2026: Why Decentralisation is the New Religion”? XAXAXA!